Other right-wing accounts variously reacted by describing the move as Orwellian, lamenting the death of free speech and even contemplating leaving Canada for good.

Oh no. Not that. Please no.

<Tee hee!>

  • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay but the new law allows police to search your online messages and accounts without warrants. Warrants are intended to BE that balance.

    And I have little faith that the law will be struck down if it “goes too far”

    If we look to the south and their “patriot act” you’ll find that it went WAY too far and the abuses were RAMPANT. Yet to this day, it’s still around.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s twenty-two years later and we still don’t have those laws here, so that is more of that fear mongering I am talking about.

      Can you send me a link about ‘the new law allows police to search your online messages and accounts without warrants’ because I haven’t heard of that and I usually keep myself pretty informed.

      • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No no, the patriot act thing was about showing that “bad laws” can exist for a LONG time.

        I don’t have a link handy for it, I’ll try to look it up later for you.

          • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, it’s not 100% accurate parallel, just the easiest one I could come up with.

            Sometimes bad laws exist for a long assed time and hurt a lot of people.

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              But Canada has much different ways to deal with laws than the States.

              That’s why I don’t bring up Cambodia’s laws and law making when I’m talking about England, it would make as much sense as what you just did.

              • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think it still generally applies, and the American legal system and Canadian one have some similarities, though I’m not really qualified to say that. Seems needlessly pedantic, but if you want a Canadian example, how’s the residential schools? Women’s rights? According to Canadian law, women didn’t qualify as persons until 1929.

                There are plenty of Canadian examples of poor laws existing for far too long a timeframe.

                • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not quite sure how to read this comment of yours, are you saying the closure of residential school and women getting rights are examples of bad laws that have stuck around?