• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    Your claim of misinformation is baseless. I gave you the information I was able to find that provides a decent idea of what the split looks like. If you want to find a more detailed split I full trust in your ability to use Google on your own.

    • ree@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      but that’s the thing.

      Baseless claim and misrepresenting data is misinformation.

      You don’t answer my question and make claims. I don’t find anything online to contextualize that number hence my first comment :

      without knowing the distribution of shares amongst staff that average means nothing.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        What data are you claiming is being misrepresented?

        You just made up a claim that isn’t sourced or based on anything. Your original comment is perfectly reasonable. We don’t know what the exact distribution of shares is. However, the article I found for you does give a bit of an insight into that. If you’re curious to find out more exact numbers then please do that instead of making unsubstantiated claims.

        • ree@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          In your title. You added the “average” information which is not present in the article you linked.

          That information at first glance suggest that each worker get $75k.

          Reporting an average without other distribution parameters is a misleading practice.

          edit: typo

            • ree@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 years ago

              Ho, now we’re getting personal. good. I’ve got a degree in statistics.

              What you wrote is still misleading.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 years ago

                It’s only misleading if you don’t understand the difference between the average and the median, which somebody with a degree in statistics certainly should. You basically made up some nonsense and stuck to your guns for two days now. Bravo, that’s some real dedication to trolling.

                • ree@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Again with the personals.

                  1. You decided to include that information in the title for a reason.

                  2. When I pointed out that it was misleading you answered with a source that has not relevance to my comment.

                  I think that your behavior is deliberate and that you’re spreading misleading information.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    You seem to take a lot of things personally. I’m just stating simple facts here. I included correct information in the title, there is absolutely nothing misleading about it. I think your behavior here is deliberate trolling and I have a strong suspicion that you didn’t know the difference between average and median until now.