I feel like someone tooling with a secure messaging app makes it less…reliable that its secure, despite yanking google play parts out of the code. Thoughts?

  • sibachian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 years ago

    I don’t know why Telegram is always the go-to topic for ‘secure messaging’, especially as a contender vs discord. When we have the option of matrix.org, which is not only encrypted, but federated.

    • HMH@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Because Telegram offers top notch user experience, apart from excellent apps they even offer native desktop clients. I really want matrix to succeed but as of now the user experience is clearly inferior.

      • sibachian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        how is it inferior? what’s wrong with the user experience of Element? it’s available on all major platforms with a native client + all modern browsers. has a nice ui. and loads of functions surpassing Telegram out of the gate.

  • MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Client is open source, but the server is not. So I would say Telegram as a service is not FOSS.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      I don’t know why people spend time building open source clients for not-self-hostable services. You could potentially spend hundreds of hours on something that can be shut down on a whim. Discord and spotify bots and clients, twitter or facebook clients, their APIs have been either severely restricted or shut down in the past.

      • ksynwa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Nitter is pretty good tho. Makes Twitter usable without logging in. But yeah a FOSS client for Telegram feels like a waste of keystrokes.