The remarks by the lawyer, Steven Sadow, came as the judge overseeing the case wrestled with how to set a trial date given Trump’s other legal entanglements and the looming campaign next year. Trump is the frontrunner for the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden in the 2024 election.

Sadow said that if Trump wins the election, he would seek to postpone the trial until after he left office, arguing that it would interfere with his responsibilities as president.

Trump, who faces four simultaneous state and federal criminal prosecutions, has repeatedly sought to delay the cases against him until after the Nov. 5, 2024, election. Sadow’s remarks show how Trump could use his campaign and a possible second four-year term in office to delay those cases, even in state courts where he would be unable to pardon himself and would not have control over the prosecutions.

  • SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If the bank robber is able to break into the bank on his second attempt, he should not be held accountable for his first attempt. Solid logic. Sure.

  • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sadow said that if Trump wins the election, he would seek to postpone the trial until after he left office, arguing that it would interfere with his responsibilities as president.

    What responsibilities? His golf schedule?

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Same people who swore that going after President Clinton while he was in office wouldn’t be a distraction are now arguing the reverse. What could have made them change their minds???

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    We already know running for president is not a protection.

    Anyone who is confused by that needs to look at 1988 and Lyndon Larouche.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaRouche_criminal_trials

    He had a grand jury indictment, arrest, and trial while he was running for President, the conviction hitting one month after the election.

    If the argument is “well, you can’t be tried while campaigning” that would block perennial candidates, who are ALWAYS running, would never fall under prosecution.

  • skellener@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    LOL! Not only is he going to trial in Georgia, he’s going to be convicted and sentenced without chance of pardon by another POTUS. He’s going to rot there until he dies.

  • Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I watched some of this, and that guy is a simpleton. He wasn’t comprehending what the issue at hand was, and McAfee seemed tired of hearing it after a point.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    give him his presidential campaign immunity. And then Biden can just murder him. Or hell let Bernie do it, he’s got 8 years he can postpone the trial for.

  • Knusper@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    The guy tried to overthrow democracy. If he gets re-elected, this is the least to worry about.