• ATGM 🚀@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    C-18 has the potential of harming Canadian content by isolating it, just like is happening here. On a platform like YouTube, this law might cause Google to redirect a lot of traffic to Canadian content creators - Which isn’t really the traffic of people who are actually interested in that content.

    This then hurts the engagement stats of Canadian creators, as a large number of users start watching a video and then leave, uninterested. It’s another example of a law with a positive intent that ends up actually hurting people on the ground. Saw this whole topic differently after reading “Seeing like a State: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed.”

  • crow@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I only see my family using google to find which articles and news websites validate their views, so I don’t see this as something so bad.

  • FiveMacs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    gestures to the internet

    Google isn’t the internet…this will literally effect nothing.

    • floofloofOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It will affect everyone who uses Google to search for the latest on a Canadian news story, or who browses Google News for local, provincial or national news. I imagine that’s quite a lot of people.

      • FiveMacs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So instead of the 1000000 different sites saying the same stuff, Canadians still be restricted to the top 5 or whatever. Nothing of value is lost imo. Plus all of it is still accessable, just got the site itself.