• usualsuspect191
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wonder what happens when it just accidentally looks like someone but was intended to be a fictional person. Also, how much can you base it on a real person before it’s considered a deep fake of that person? Would race-swapping be enough to make it a “new” person so it’s not illegal anymore? My intuition is that just eye colour or something wouldn’t be enough, but it’s a sliding scale where the line must be drawn somewhere even if it’s a fuzzy line.

    What about an AI generated mashup of two people like those “what the child would look like” pictures back in the day. Does that violate both people or neither?

    What about depicting a person older than they are now? That’s technically not somebody that exists, but might in the future.

    What if you use AI but make it look like it’s hand-drawn or a cartoon?

    What if you use AI to create sexual voice clips of a real person but use images that don’t look like them or no image at all?

    There are just so many possibilities and questions that I feel it might be impossible to legislate in a way that isn’t always 10 steps behind or has a million unforeseen consequences.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s already laws against using someone’s likeness for commercial purposes without their consent, I’m guessing this will require the same fuzzy cutoff and basically just be up to the jury to decide or the judge to dismiss.

    • WamGams
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, let’s find out. Please give me 20 sample photos of you, 30 minutes of audio and 10 of video.

      I’m going to have you get gangbanged by 100 German men and upload it to xvideos.

      Now, that is probably something you deserve to consent to, isn’t it?