Former President Donald Trump owes an additional $87,502 in post-judgment interest every day until he pays the $354 million fine ordered by Judge Arthur Engoron in his civil fraud case, according to ABC News’ calculations based on the judge’s lengthy ruling in the case.

Judge Engoron on Friday fined Trump $354 million plus approximately $100 million in pre-judgment interest in the civil fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, after he found that Trump and his adult sons had inflated Trump’s net worth in order to get more favorable loan terms. The former president has denied all wrongdoing and has said he will appeal.

Engoron ordered Trump to pay pre-judgment interest on each ill-gotten gain – with interest accruing based on the date of each transaction – as well as a 9% post-judgment interest rate once the court enters the judgment in the case.

  • nova_ad_vitum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    • The NYC AG decided to sue anyways because it’s technically not allowed to misrepresent your income on a bank form

    By “technically” you mean legally. In accordance with the law.

    The judge decides on an excessive amount of fines simply because they hate him and want to ruin his campaign

    Prove it. And then send that proof to Trump, in sure whatever ambulance chaser is representing him now would interested to have that proof .

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s also legally not allowed to cross an intersection on a red light in order to get to work faster when you’re running late, but who’s keeping track?

          • PhAzE
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            4 months ago

            And Trump was caught and fined for his “running of the red light”. Stop making mental gymnastics to cover for this rapist.

      • nova_ad_vitum
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        So no proof the judge acted out of malice? Just more bullshit you made up? I’ll try to contain my surprise.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t know if the judge did, but the AG likely acted out of malice. Just ask yourself who benefits from this ruling? As far as I can tell, the bank doesn’t even get any of the money, it all goes to the state. And the Democrat party, of which Letitia James is a member, gets to hurt a political rival in the upcoming federal elections at a critical time in their campaign.

          Yes, I know that’s not proof, but there’s certainly motive.

          • grozzle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            So now you’re saying politicians should only be prosecuted by members of their own party. Go to a doctor, tell them your brain fell out, ask for help.

            • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s not just the party affiliation, it’s also the timing.

              Perhaps you should take your own advice there.

          • nova_ad_vitum
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Why didn’t Trump just not break the law? Why is that too much to ask?

      • Grant_M
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        trump cult are having a tough time with this.