Seriously though, whose bright idea was that, and why was it allowed to continue for so long?

  • Adderbox76
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    i was actually amazed at how Stewart was able to step back in and almost immediately it felt like he’d never been away. It’s HIS show. Always will be. Watching that first episode on Monday just felt right again.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, he took it from being a pure comedy, almost a joke of a show, to something that defined a new category of TV. People forget that he was not the first host of the show. Craig Kilborn was great, but it was totally a different show, it was all about laughs and pop culture.

      Then Stewart came along, and it turned into this brilliant quasi-news satirical-but-serious show that changed the way a lot of people thought about politics, news, television, and American culture as a whole.

      Yeah, sometimes Stewart had to struggle to keep the balance of the show. There was a push to make it purely into a serious news show, but that’s not what it was best at. That showed up most often with interviews, where John took flak for not treating it as an opportunity to go hard at politicians in particular. But he was right, that’s not what the show was for, nor would it have worked. Not only did they not have an obligation to push hard on guests, I would say they had an obligation not to.

      Which is tangential, but I think it explains why the show is his in a way that nobody else could pull off. He was deep in the entire process of the show.

    • ShadowA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Agreed, but then I watched Tuesday with the new host and lost interest halfway through.

      I think Stewart is good at getting serious between the funny bits, but the other guy just tries to be funny constantly and it doesn’t work for me.