I’m curious how “strict” strict is. My guess is the problematic person needs to be the main creative force behind that particular thing? The Harry Potter movies: void those, or is the fact it’s an adaptation add enough additional people to the mix that’s it’s sufficiently separated from the originals?
I include HP movies and any other HP licensed products as strict. Only because JK Rolling is financially benefiting from them and they are still from her work.
I’m curious how “strict” strict is. My guess is the problematic person needs to be the main creative force behind that particular thing? The Harry Potter movies: void those, or is the fact it’s an adaptation add enough additional people to the mix that’s it’s sufficiently separated from the originals?
I include HP movies and any other HP licensed products as strict. Only because JK Rolling is financially benefiting from them and they are still from her work.