I am currently using Windows on an older HP Laptop, which I intend to replace with a Framework 16 by next summer, but my Desktop PC at home has been running EndeavourOS, my first ever Linux distro, since last summer, so I have some Arch-based experience.

As a learning experience I’d like to install raw Arch, but I’m wondering if it makes sense as a primary OS on something that should be a stable system, since I intend to use the laptop for university. I am planning on using btrfs and timeshift, so it shouldn’t break too horribly, even if something goes wrong (and I don’t wanna jinx it, but so far my EndeavourOS pc has been entirely fine too, so I didn’t even run into such an issue yet), but depending on who you ask Arch is either the most stable distro they’ve ever used or bricked their pc ten seconds into the install process.

So now I’m curious on if you all think this is a stupid idea or if it should be fine. Should I try installing Arch and then for actual use replace it with another distro like Debian LTS, NixOS or something like Mint on a machine which fulfills a more critical role than my PC at home, or should I be alright rolling with Arch on my uni laptop?

As a side note, what’s your take on using Arch vs EndeavourOS? It’s roughly the same fundamentally, so is there any point in using Arch apart from the learning experience and being able to say “I use arch btw”? My reasoning for actually wanting to use it and not just wanting to set it up for the learning experience and then switching off to EOS or something entirely different is “I think it’s neat”, which is hardly a good reason long-term.

  • smoothbrain coldtakes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Laptop is fine as a tinkering device, but if you have something critical it’s best not to trust a rolling release. I would recommend Fedora Silverblue or something else immutable that automatically updates and does not have a lot of incompatibility issues.

    Arch is not something to be relying on consistently. You can make it stable, but then one day you will do a yay -Syu and all of a sudden your critical machine is offline pending troubleshooting that is not required with more stable distros.

    EOS is the best out of the box Arch experience I’ve had, it makes it a lot more user friendly than just the base, and it can be customized just as much as the base. When I was running Arch I was running EOS and it was good for what I needed, although I have had it basically brick itself with an update. I am currently running Fedora Silverblue on my laptop and it’s been very stable.

    • Astaroth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      yay -Syu

      you don’t use yay do you

      Edit: typing yay without any other argument defaults to yay -Syu so there’s no reason to type it out

      • smoothbrain coldtakes
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess I didn’t know yay by itself as a command was an alias for pacman -Syu, guess I’ve just always been redundantly using -Syu.

        • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No op but. Yeah I’m new to endeavor and a lot of the how toos I read about yay specifically had -Syu included… But yeah… Do what you want. Include it or don’t, it’s the same.