EDIT: If the elections.ca website is down for you, see here

Election Information

I recommend that you check the links yourself! I’ve copied some of the information below:

Ways to vote

See this page for full details.

Vote on election day (April 28)

Vote by mail

Special Ballots

Remember: Once you apply to vote by special ballot, you can’t change your mind and vote at advance polls or on election day.

See this page for deadlines for when you can apply for one, and when they must receive it by. It also has information on what you must do differently when filling out this ballot: https://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=vote&dir=spe&document=index&lang=e

If you are having any issues, reach out to your local Elections Canada office to know your options.

Data on your district:

Find your riding, your local Elections Canada office, and your candidates by using the search on the homepage: elections.ca

You can also use the detailed search at: elections.ca/scripts/vis/FindED

  • wise_pancake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think they might pick up seats in areas like Ontario and Manitoba, even areas like Hamilton.

    That’s my concern anyway.

    • Oderus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      They did much better in ON that many thought, but they lost and Pierre lost his seat. So that’s great news.

      • wise_pancake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m personally pretty happy with the outcome overall

        But yeah exactly what I was thinking would happen did.

        Poll aggregators undercounted less traditional voters but did count things like older conservatives moving liberal.

        I don’t think this is a “shy conservative” phenomenon, which CBC and polling companies are talking about that a lot today. it’s really a failure in models to adapt to non baseline conditions, and this was sort of a black swan election.

        That became clear to me when advanced turnout was so high.

        I think the future for models should be to incorporate more “causal” style models, and for pollsters to break their traditional voter demographics up more. Right now it’s not granular enough.

        • Oderus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          They talked about having higher numbers skewing the models so yeah, it’ll be something that’ll adjust over time. I’m quite happy with how everything turned out.