• mysticpickle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    Waaaaait a sec here. Isn’t wearing a steel cuirass in the middle ocean a really bad idea especially in the middle of combat? If you get knocked overboard you’re pretty much finished right?

    Can someone confirm if this was an actual thing that was commonly done or was this just artistic license being used here? :o

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      If you fall into the drink in the middle of a large-scale naval battle, you’re probably in a pretty awful position even if you’re a good swimmer with no armor on. Contemporary depictions of naval battles show boarding troops in full armor, and armor was assigned to ship crews (and not just the troops they were transporting), so it’s pretty fair to say that armored boarding marines were a reality at least some of the time.

      • mysticpickle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        TIL the basics of 16th century naval boarding actions:

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          That’s why it’s so important that boarding troops be specialized marines - landlubbers ain’t got sea legs!

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      I wouldn’t want to be a marine period, but between the choices of higher risk of drowning vs higher risk of being stabbed in the lung, I’d take the armor if it was offered.