I know some places are more progressive in this regard. But from the U.S., I’d like to see every person entitled to:

  • shelter
  • food
  • healthcare
  • education and higher education

(As an aside, not sure “right” is the best term here, I think of these more as commitments that society would make because we have abundance. One advantage of the word “right” is that a person is justified in expecting it - it’s not welfare/ a benefit / a privilege)

  • BloodForTheBloodGod
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Control of my own work product.

    That is, workplace democracy. Out with the oligarchs!

    • yeather
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can always go freelance or start a company, no one’s controlling the projects you work on then.

      • BloodForTheBloodGod
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Assuming I could survive that way, eventually my choices would be “become an exploiter” or “establish a worker’s coop.”

        The owner class are parasites.

      • sumofchemicals@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most people are not in a financial position to start their own business. And in a sense, starting your own business in a best case results in a benevolent dictatorship. Every person makes mistakes and has blind spots. So one person should not be in charge of decisions controlling everyone’s work.

        I would encourage people to freelance or start a co-op, and I think in the long term large co-ops (like fortune 500 size) are the preferable path. But if we waited for bootstrapped co-ops to reach critical mass we’d be waiting hundreds of years. One thing I’m excited about is the Obran cooperative, because they look set to convert private businesses to co-ops at a relatively large scale.

        From a government standpoint in the long term I think about businesses with more than one employee being required to use one person one vote governance. (not necessarily all direct democracy, for example it could be electing a board who appoints management) But we’re a long ways away from that and it would be smart to move in phases to not destroy the actual value in existing corporations. So maybe some policies as a starting point would be: government funds for creating co-ops and converting co-ops, bidding advantage for co-ops responding to government RFPs and a requirement for corporations of certain size to have some minimum employee representation on their board.