While the second one is hilarious, it doesn’t sound lesbiany enough. So my vote is on “I like your mom”.

I meant the other white shirt, the one that the lady in a grey hat wears.

Black shirt in the back clearly says “Titties sucker”, but I can’t guess what the white shirt says.

And a felon, don’t forget that part.

The article is from a libanaise news network that I know personally nothing about but that Wikipedia describes as “pro-Hezbollah”.

So my guess is that putting Israel in quotation marks is a sign of anti-Zionism : it denies that the state of Israel exists (or at least don’t recognize it’s legitimacy).

Despite that, the information is valid : french dockers union did block an arm shipment to Israel, it was reported by other (less polarized) medias.

was

Yes

It’s a law, every employer must allow voters 3h of time to vote : https://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=faq&document=faqtimo&lang=e

Allegedly

Innocent until a jury decides otherwise.

This is the good old time that the MAGA folk want to bring back.

So,I hate to admit it, but let me go against the pack here. Tariffs unfortunately work as Trump is claiming they work, but not for the reason he thinks. You see, while the US customers are the ones that will fit the bill, this isn’t the whole story.

Canadian businesses will try to lower their prices to stay competitive. And our governments (federal and provincials) have already stated that they will help businesses and workers as much as they can, probably with subsidies.

Every time a Canadian businesses lower it’s price to stay competitive with the tariffs and every time our governments pay subsidies to help with that, Canadians are effectively paying for Trump’s tariffs. (Note that this will have been 100% true with a small tariff, but 25% is too much to absorb, so part of the cost will go towards US customers).

With that in mind, counter-tarrifs makes perfect sense, but the assumption here is that US and states governments will help US businesses hit by the tariffs. We may be wrong on this part

I can’t see how this would work. The “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” part refers to the children born in the US, not their parents. But don’t quote me on this, I’m not a lawyer.

Replace Japan with Germany and I’m in.

Furthermore, it completely defeats the purpose of sovereigns citizenry. Aren’t they supposed to not recognize the government’s authority ? If their plate was issued by the DOT, it means they entered a contract with them. Or something like that, not 100% sure about the (lack of) logic here.

When I was 16, had a game with my friends. I was allied with my best friend, and we were planning an invasion where I would convoy his army through the Mediterranean with my fleet. Stabbed him in the back and switched alliances instead.

25 years later, my friend still resents me for this.

Best game ever, 10/10, would betray again.

Guy should just surrender and go to trial. I bet they will find it hard to get 12 person to find him guilty.

When I became a Canadian citizen, around a decade ago, I pledged fealty to Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada.

So, Canada (and probably Australia too) is a kingdom different from the United Kingdom, that happens to have the same monarch. Different crowns, same person under it. Given that the British monarch only retains a ceremonial role in every country that they “rules”, having the same one doesn’t make a lot of differences from having our separate one.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This video is blocked in my country. Girl another source ?