https://github.com/First-Non-Interesting-Username/NixOS-config

please find an exposed API key or other secret.

The amout and quality of training data correlates with quality of AI models.

Anecdotal evidence.

Gitlab doesn’t offer free CI, is worse integrated into other tools with emphasis on AI agents.

They also don’t contribute to societal improvements, like github does.

Is Codeberg ecosystem as mature as GitHub?

I’m not gonna pay few hundred dollars, to get the same CI and worse quality service overall.

Codeberg is technophobic too, AI is the greatest technological innovation since the Internet and they don’t allow for it to train on their repos, nor have any official endorsed agent.

Oh no, they will improve the service with public data, how horrible

They’re completely different things.

NixOS Mobile is Linux on Mobile project, based on desktop NixOS. It’s one of the worst maintained Linux on Mobile distros and I don’t reccomend it to anyone who haven’t tried both NixOS and other distro for phones.

LineageOS is a well maintained Android (AOSP) fork.

If you want to dive deeper into Linux on Mobile, I reccomend starting with PostmarketOS. It’s a full Linux distro, unrelated to Android.

Could you reframe your question? I don’t understand it

Absolutely based, but it shouldn’t be opt out, it should be forced instead.

Dear American government, I have a better idea: Ban proprietary software on routers. You can even go a bit further and ban proprietary OSes totally. This way nobody will spy on your citizens without their knowledge.

People here: “Hahha, I’m so smart, I’m going to flash openwrt/opnsense and use whatever PC as a router”

They want you to do that. This law exists for a reason, to decrease use of foreign proprietary, potentially unsafe software in critical infrastructure.

By using openwrt you’re doing what lawmakers want you to do.

Than the Iranian regime is the worst.

They’re in life or dead situation, don’t have to worry about voters and can’t be checked by free media.

This sounds reasonable

Stores the user’s birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26- 051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc.

This is a poor wording

That law doesn’t require to verify the age of the user, it doesn’t have to, because it’s a law for parents.

What you’re saying is exactly slippery slope. You’re taking earlier examples of completely different laws, with different purposes and mechanisms, and you make your argument based on how the implementation of those laws worked.

Occam’s razor explanation of DMCA 1201: The law makers wanted to foolproof the law and implemented security measures that weren’t needed.

Also THE only argument you have for the fact thisaw is going to be changed is the law that changed (even if only temporarily) IN A GOOD DIRECTION!

You really made me laugh.

Who is pushing for this?

I want to know that too.

I know meta lobbied for app store accountability act or smth, I don’t remember it’s name. They didn’t do that to spy on people, but because they wanted to shift the blame.

This is a law FOR PARENTS.

It’s not a law for children, it doesn’t target to protect children from up, but to give parents the tools to set the age of the kids themselves.

Do you have any proof that those systems were created for control? You sure have if you express your opinions with such confidence.

But they did what the laws (Californian, Colorado’s and basically every other, except for the New York’s and Texan) required them to do.

Only penalty in this law is for OS makers that didn’t include such rules in the OS, paying per affected child.

Marie WHAT?

Maria Skłodowska-Curie

Slippery slope again

Lawmakers don’t care whether you’re 18 or 56