Trump kept those tax records more secret than military classified information.

Maybe in the future the Pentagon should label those documents as tax records and health reports instead

Honestly, couldn’t care about these actors or singers endorsements and I don’t think they will change many peoples minds (I don’t think swifties are the type of people who would vote for Trump)

It’s probably more important to the right wing for endorsements by large business owners, the science community, industry and religious leaders

For morale, endorsements from large furniture stores would probably have the biggest impact for JD Vance

The right wing tend to care more about making money, so endorsements by musicians might not matter much

yeah… Here in Australia, they were also the only political party around who never removed their shitty signage after the election (and they legally have to). I’m surprised the Election council didn’t do it for them and send them the bill. I think the problem with those wankers is that they constantly try to get away with dodgy actions, and they end up being successful so many times, that they just keep doing it

Presumably… If you’re complaining about the use of Javascript, you have some coding knowledge. Otherwise it’s like complaining about the steering wheel in a car, when you can’t drive and don’t have a licence.

Either they have the knowledge to confirm your answer, or you’re just being a backseat driver

Exactly this. Many of them are concerned about how it might affect their work too and their families if they found out they’re were horrible racist people.

It’s part of the reason why the KKK wore clokes

Found the MAGA voter… Btw, your mates won’t see this post online… So not sure why you’re trying to impress them still? You can act normal :)

I dunno mate… Even Bezo’s moved to more environmental packaging of his crap.

Whereas Trump would blame the trees for causing global warming, and offer to package his chinese junk for extra money with a trading card made out of the suit he wore when he was engaging in the insurrection

Even things like lazy loading and such require js though

A lot of features might not be obvious honestly

If you’re interested though, you could check the source which should be able to tell you immediately what they use it for

It only surveils idiots who are speeding.

Why is this not fuvk people who put pedestrians, cyclists and other drivers in danger

Wow. Only 12%

Primary schools and secondary schools should be 0 lol

This isn’t a hard concept to understand imho.

I agree, the amnesty didn’t turn in ALL firearms. That’s completely missing the point

HOWEVER… The entire point of the amnesty, is to make it illegal for ownership of certain firearms, make them illegal to resell, etc., but you give people incentive to give up and make money from the ones they shouldn’t own

Over time, you end up with far less guns in circulation.

That’s what happened here in Australia.

You might still have a huge amount of firearms, but the aim isn’t to solve the problem overnight. But, it saves a huge amount of the problem immediately, and over time, it solves the issue…

It works… It worked for us. You’re playing the short game.

You’re trying to argue that unless the solution is 100%, it isn’t worth pursuing.

No, but we have some of the most effective protection against shootings in the world. So it would be silly to ignore a working solution. We don’t have a lot of the things on that list

They already changed that didn’t they?

I was in denver 2 weeks ago, and didn’t seem like anyone was going to jail for cannabis…

It didn’t stop gun violence.

Gun violence has very little to do with drug legalisation. It seems like people are just tacking it on as something they want, but it seems fairly dishonest, especially since you guys are getting a lot of mass shootings at schools and such which clearly aren’t related. It might only reduce the number of smaller shootings

Better gun control is the primary factor that stops gun violence in most countries. At this time, everyone in US treats them like toys and fashion accessories. So when someone is getting bullied or having a shitty week, its very easy for them to snap and react. Here in Australia, they can’t easily react by grabbing a gun.

We pulled the majority of them out of circulation for a reason… And it worked

Ending the war on drugs doesn’t. I disagree

Sorry. It’s the exact opposite. Here in Australia we have a serious meth problem and we are full of assholes who are incredibly toxic and drugged up. Ending the war on drugs just makes addictive drugs even more accessible, so people are more likely to try them and encourage others to do so

Highly addictive drugs should not be legalized, and it certainly isn’t the reason for school shootings and such

What protects us is gun laws, and you guys need stronger ones

Where exactly did she do that. Source…

That sounds like a Facebook statement where eople like you just keep coming up with increasingly absurd comments until you forget what the truth is (like those anti EV people on Facebook who have somehow convinced themselves that petrol is cleaner and EVs constantly blow up, because they just keep upping their own comments).

So I’d really like a source on that one

No joke.

At what point should maga be designated a terrorist organisation?

Because, I’d say that point was reached month’s ago.

If the people storming the capital were Muslim, they would have bombed entire countries

It’s not about free electricity though. It’s about efficiency

It’s not about cost

The facts are, with hydrogen, you waste at least 40% of the energy excluding transport due to inefficiencies and manufacture and fuel wastage . So you need to build a lot more solar panels. You also need clean water to do it

With electric, you waste less than 10%

We don’t have hydrogen planes yet, and it might not really be that feasible (there are a lot of considerations for planes. I’ve actually got a pilot licence).

With hydrogen, you need almost twice the solar panels to produce the same results

You also need to consider, battery technologies are still early days. If lithium at the moment supports 1000km of travel, later generation lithium air can support 12000km with the same space.

That’s why hydrogen has such limited applications too. Because even if you increase the density of lithium 2x, most applications where hydrogen benefits disappears

But in reality we’d probably shift from lithium anyway I’m guessing

Hydrogen still hugely better than gas though, and Trump is an idiot lol

Be specific. What exactly?

Because Obama also got a lot done he promised

In contrast, Trump clearly makes up things on the spot to impress whoever is in the room at the time

Even at 100% efficiency when producing, the efficiency of the car will still be much lower than battery (even batteries from decades ago were 90%+ efficient).

Electric distribution basically abstract the energy source away from the car (you can use any battery chemistry). You can also feed power back into the grid

With hydrogen, realistically, you just need to pray you improve it long term. Because at the moment it’s an efficiency suckfest.

But it’s awesome for petrol companies and dodgy salespeople who want to provide cheap fuel that continues to F**k us whilst undercutting green alternatives

I have housemates. And cameras and dogs… But you’re normally right

That was my exact first impression of this post.

Basically Sovcit nonsense