We asked professionals if they wanted Apple’s desktop, and they all said no.

  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, it’s just a really bad value compared to the rest of the lineup. It’s basically a Mac Studio in a larger case and a PCIe breakout board bolted on. That’s it. But for twice the price of the Mac Studio and 10 times it size.

    The only unique features is has are PCIe and SATA ports. So unless you really need a ton of local storage or a ton of GPU-power, there’s no reason to buy it.

    • BattleOften@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you need a ton of local storage, it would be cheaper to buy a NAS and some 20TB drives for it than to upgrade from a Studio to a Mac Pro. Especially with a 10-gig Ethernet connection.

    • X3I@lemmy.x3i.tech
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I recall correctly, you cannot even put GPUs in there, right? Only other pci peripherals, or did this change?

      • Kelsenellenelvial
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was my understanding. I suppose the other things that would use the PCIe slots is tasks requiring churning through massive datasets, maybe ingesting media like raw audio and video feeds, maybe science/research. Things where just getting the data in and out of the computer is more limiting than the actual processing of the data.

        I think that’s a pretty tiny market, but Apple wants to keep it going as much to say they have one of the most powerful desktop computers available as the actual economics.