• wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    really my rule of thumb has always been when it’s a significant upgrade.

    for a long time i didn’t really upgrade until it was a 4x increase over my old. certain exceptions were occasionally made. nowadays i’m a bit more opportunistic in my upgrades. but i still seek out ‘meaningful’ upgrades. upgrades that are a decent jump over the old. typically 50% improvement in performance, or upgrades i can get for really cheap.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      4x…? Even in older cards that’s more than a decade between cards.

      A 4080 is only 2.5x as powerful as a 1080ti, those are 5 years apart.

      • Sigmatics
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What’s wrong with upgrading once every 5-10 years? Not everyone plays the latest games on 4k Ultra

        Admittedly 4x is a bit steep, more like 3-4x

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Starfield requires a minimum 1070ti to play. It’s not just about fidelity, you just wouldn’t be able to play any newer games.

          • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I had a 1080ti and the only game that really gave me grief playing on high settings was Starfield. I’m not saying older cards won’t have problems playing newer games but I am saying all cards have problems playing Starfield.