cross-posted from: https://vlemmy.net/post/289714
Archived version: https://archive.ph/qjsq7
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230626125012/https://www.wired.com/story/us-ai-regulation-congress-briefings/
cross-posted from: https://vlemmy.net/post/289714
Archived version: https://archive.ph/qjsq7
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230626125012/https://www.wired.com/story/us-ai-regulation-congress-briefings/
LLMs are very rudimentary forms of AI, they’re not even the kind of AI that I think we should be worried about.
I wouldn’t even call them an “intelligence” at all, more like an aggregated set of data.
Not an ML and AI specialist or anything but what I’ve seen of some of the technical details, with my “some” education and experience in software engineering, did not lead me to believe we are anywhere close to actual artificial intelligence.
General AI is already changing the fundamentals of multiple areas of life and there is no stopping that. And legislations are not written with future in mind, so even if some regulation is passed it will be already outdated. It might be pessimistic view by some, but one thing is true - humans can’t stop progress it’s our nature. So we will work on these technologies no matter what.