The bears now have as many wins in 13 games using a backup QB as they do in 31 games when Fields starts. People keep talking about how bad the rest of the roster is (which is true) but it’s crazy how other guys have somehow managed to get it done.

  • ADBuilt@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fields is likely a bust but honestly this is a coaching problem more than a QB problem. We clown the Bears for never having “the guy” at QB, but the coaches that have cycled through Halas Hall are basically all memes in their own right.

    Owners need to go.

    • Chi_BearHawks@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like Fields is far from a bust. Statistically, he’s become a mid-tier QB this season, and I think that’s perfectly fine.

      Half of the teams in the league would have an upgrade with him at QB and he’s a clear #2 (behind only Trevor Lawrence) coming out the largest QB draft class in history. He doesn’t need to be a locked-in top 5 to not be a “bust”.

      Last year we had 5 games in a row, averaging 30 points for that stretch, but went 1-4 because of the defense - yet he gets the blame, when he was the clear reason we were even in those games.

      Obviously, I’m still in on him, and I feel like the horrible coaching and playcalling is playing a part in him not taking the gigantic leap many expected in the offseason. You see the same behavioral issues and habits (only worse) with Bagent, and it becomes clear that our entire QB room is suffering from the way they are coached.

    • boonkles@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it’s a fields problem, not a single coach could have turned that guy into a quality starter

    • LeBremsstrahlung@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think being a bust is a coaching problem the majority of the time. I don’t think Fields ever stood a chance at developing there the same way Mahomes probably wouldn’t have if he were taken instead of Trubisky.

    • BlurstOfTimes11@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a neutral with no real concern for any of the teams or players, fields was leading the NFL in TDs when he got hurt, and it seemed like the coaches didn’t want him to run for the first month, and then he started to run a little and had back to back 4 TD games.

      As for Nagy/trubisky, it seemed like Mitch would have a great game where he had designed runs and roll outs, then the next game they’d have him do 40 7-step drops and he’d be awful. That’s a coaching problem if you can’t see what he was good at and then build on it.