Since October 7, more than 3,257 children have been reported killed, including at least 3,195 in Gaza, 33 in the West Bank, and 29 in Israel, according to the Ministries of Health in Gaza and Israel respectively. The number of children reported killed in just three weeks in Gaza is more than the number killed in armed conflict globally – across more than 20 countries – over the course of a whole year, for the last three years.

  • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shields implies that they would use them to block something. Their death means that they obviously weren’t effective in that. You can only use something as a shield if it stops the enemy from doing that thing. The fact that they were still murdered falls at the feet of Israel. You know, as the people that dropped the weapons on their heads.

    • Grant_M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. Terrorist Hamas knew there would be a retaliation for their barbaric murderous attack and should have had all civilians in an area separate from themselves in preparation.

      • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. So when people take hostages or use human shields that’s because good guys don’t kill the hostages or shoot through them. The innocent lives matter. That’s how that works. If you act the same if they’re there or not it makes you just as bad. Maybe worse. Glad I could help you figure that out.

        • Grant_M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Hamas are terrorist barbarians who actively get civilians killed in order to protect themselves.

          • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes. If you get in a car chase after a murder suspect and run over a civilian with your car, you murdered them. Now that murder could be said to be a mistake. If you consciously run over a civilian because they are in the path between you and the murderer that is very much murder. Now if you go around doing that consistently it’s possible you might be the terrorist, as by definition:

            terrorism, the calculated use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective.

                • Grant_M
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I do not support the bigot RW Israeli government. NO

                  • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Cool. Then perhaps start jumping on the immediate ceasefire train, because for better or worse the majority of the world aren’t going to differentiate the crimes by who was in charge.

            • mwguy@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Actually, the law in that case would charge the fleeing subject with a murder or aggrivated manslaughter charge (depending on the state).

              If you run from police illegally, you’re responsible for the damages cause in the chase (in most states).