I went to the Ontario Hydro calculator to look at switching from oil heating to electric (natural gas not available here). This calculator says that I can save about $400 per year by switching. I have much doubt about this. Has anyone actually done this switch? Do you believe this?

Edit: some more info I should have provided:

First of all, I believe this would be for a forced air electric furnace. This should easily swap in for my oil furnace, I would just have to add a 220 line.

I live in central Ontario. I don’t have or need/want air conditioning, so there is nothing to save there.

I am not sure about a heat pump for my case, since it would not be used in the summer and they become less efficient as it gets colder. I am not sure I can rely on a heat pump as my only heating source.

  • rbesfe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Oil heating is inefficient and expensive to fuel, so it makes sense you would save money switching to electric. Before moving forward I would recommend consulting with an electrician or HVAC company to see if your electrical service can handle it.

    Also I’m not an expert but I think most heat pump systems have backup resistive heaters for when it gets too cold

    • Dearche
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      This really is the main question. If you’re just going to use normal electric heating, the difference probably won’t be much (it’ll still probably be cheaper, but not by this much). If you’re using an air heat pump, the difference will be greater, in addition to the new system also doing air conditioning during the summer (so you can throw away your old air conditioning bill). A geo-heat pump is by far the most efficient, and may beat that price, depending on the exact system you’re comparing to. Works both in the summer and winter and even the most extreme situations, but is also expensive to install.

      That said, there might also be tax rebates for the installation. I remember the Feds mentioning this in the last bill for the east coast, and Ontario might be included. Even if not, there might be more local rebates as well.

      All that said, I do strongly recommend some sort of heat pump system, as the cost of fossil fuel systems will rise in the future, even if we’re talking about the critical level arriving a decade along the way. Though depending on how things go, it might be sooner.

  • TemporaryBoyfriend
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Modern heat pumps work down to -30C, at which point the furnace supplements with electric heat which is built into the unit.

    My electricity costs dropped 50% over my builder-grade piece-of-shit electric furnace & AC unit – and I even increased from a 2 ton to a 2.5 ton system. The initial cost was about $12k, and it will take 8 to 10 years to break even, less if the cost electricity keeps increasing the way it has over the last 10 years.

    Also, you may not want A/C now, but you will shortly – heat waves are getting more severe each year.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    We had them when I lived in Montana, and we’d get down to -38C. They have a backup resistive heater built in. I’d supplement it with a little resistive heater, (mainly because I didn’t realize there was a resistive heat mode, lol), but even at its coldest, the air source heatpump was fine. This was in the US, but it was about $130 USD/month during the coldest months for about 800 square feet, decent insulation, double paned glass, ground floor apartment. That bill was for everything- heating, electric water heater, computer, lights, oven, washer/dryer/dishwasher. Summer power bills were about $60 for everything, and that was with the heat pump running cold air. Montana doesn’t even have the cheapest electricity. Suffice to say I was sad when my next apartment(s) did not have that, and I spent considerably more to heat and cool it, haha.

    Aside from being remarkably less expensive due to their efficiency is the benefit that you don’t have to worry about natural gas /oil refills, fuel fires, and carbon monoxide from furnace issues. And depending on where you source your electricity from, you might be decoupled from the whims of OPEC/local production issues in your area.

    I’d say, before you spend anything on your furnace or heatpump, I’d check your insulation and windows. Those go a long way in saving you money, regardless of outcome.

  • tarsn
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Between electric heating, electric water heaters, electric car chargers, electric stoves and dryers… 200a won’t be enough

    • LetMeThinkAboutIt@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Lol. I (Quebecer) have 200a panel, electric resistive heating (in every room including a detached garage, no central AHU) + mini-split heat pump + electric car charger + electric water heater and my power demand never go above 15 kW (which equates to ~ 62 Amps).

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Even with the most generous assumptions (120V@200A=24kW instead of 240V which is double)… You could be running all of these at maximum rated loads simultaneously and still not trip your main breaker/fuse. Typical midrange residential unit values below:

      • Car charger 4.8kW
      • Oven range 8.5kW
      • Water Heater 3kW
      • Laundry Dryer 1.5kW
      • Electric Air Heater 6kW

      Total is 23.8kW which is 198.3A@120V.