• megopie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yah, I’m really not enthused with the idea of having to pay monthly rent for my computers ability to function.

    I wonder if intel just values their existing experience with 86 more than any potential efficiency gains since the efficiency matters a lot less when the whole system is just a glorified screen and antenna.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d say their recent trend towards packing in E(fficiency)-cores along with their previously standard P(erformance)-core design shows that they’re sensitive to and reacting to both the higher core counts of AMD and the greater efficiency of ARM

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m really not sure even Microsoft could get away with that

      The moment a subscription service comes into play for something they take for granted as free people will start looking at alternatives. Chromebooks and macbooks exist and from what I hear Chromebooks are starting to become serious competition for Windows

      Plus Linux desktop obviously getting more user friendly and preinstalled on laptops