• BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He is prove the system is already broken. When in a democracy, voters who can read and write, who are impoverished and on avg can’t even afford a $500 emergency vote for a billionaire, I’d say that is a failure of the system.

    • BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      edit: I am not saying billionaires are worse than anybody else, I am just saying their interests probably don’t have a lot of overlap with the avg voter.

      • sploosh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Billionaires are worse than everyone else. Greed on their scale is killing the planet and people.

      • s1ndr0m3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one becomes a billionaire through ethical means. You have to grind people down to make that kind of money.

      • gatelike@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imagine waking up with billions of dollars. What would you do with it? If you say keep it and try o take more from the populous then you are an enemy of the populous. They have brain damage from greed. They are worse than everyone else.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would spend all but 1 billion on just buying wetlands and the legal resources to make sure they never get touched. Doing good the laziest way possible.

          With the remaining billion I will start my own space program.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh don’t apologize! Let me show you something:

        • 10,000 seconds = 2.8 hours
        • 100,000 seconds = 27.8 hours
        • 1,000,000 seconds = 11.6 days
        • 10,000,000 seconds = 115.7 days
        • 1,000,000,000 seconds = 31.7 YEARS

        I haven’t even lived for a billion seconds yet and I was born in 94! A billion is a truly obscene high quantity. I don’t think there’s a moral way to gain that much wealth, and if there is, it’s an exceptionally rare possibility.

        • Xerø@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am 1,735,668,000 seconds old, and so I have seen some shit. Donald Trump is just an unseemly hiccup in an insignificant span of time. There were ghastly horrors before him and there will be ghastly horrors after him. These nuisances seem important because this is your now, you’ll realize how little they meant when this is your then. As in, it seemed so important then, while you look back at the Land of Then from the clear hilltops of After.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are objectively worse - it’s immoral for a billionaire to exist (meaning to amass that amount of money, not to physically exist). You can’t get to that point without knowingly/actively hurting others. They are worse people, period… and you don’t have to cover your bases and backpedal on this point. Starts to sound line the famous “temporarily embarrassed millionaires” quote.

    • ILikeBoobies
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why the Electoral College exists

      If people are voting for Trump then they will put their votes towards a better alternative

      • BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ironically Hillary Clinton had 3 million more votes than Trump. Without electoral college it would have been a Hillary Presidency.

        • Gumby@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’ve had 6 presidential elections in the 21st century. The Republican candidate won the popular vote one out of those 6 times. Yet we’ve had 3 Republican Presidential terms resulting from those elections.

        • ILikeBoobies
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, it doesn’t work as intended but political parties weren’t intended either