• King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    i pay 1k to browse instagram so I dont care about its perfomance

    • weew
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      surprisingly this is how people defend the new pixel 8 pro.

      $999 for mid-range performance? “Well I don’t play games anyway so it’s fine”

      • King@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nice let them gaslight themselves I need those suckers to keep competition alive

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is any of that untrue? The pixels do a lot of things that no other phones do, why should the average phone user care about peak performance?

        • weew
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          because it costs $999.

          it only does what a <$500 phone can do, the the only reason pixels can “do what no other phones do” is not capability but artificial restrictions.