I think I’m having a bit of an autistic burnout moment over politics. I’m moving a lot more left over the years but just don’t feel like I can do anything. I have 2 years left on a work contract and it would be killer to lose that job, but also I want to help people in ways where quitting might be the best option. I want to learn about politics and history more, but I also don’t want to stress about it because I don’t feel like it changes things that much. Id like a community that talks about these feelings and I feel like this should be that community for me. Let’s just chat about it.

  • AngularAloe@beehaw.orgEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    1. It’s based/relies on utilitarianism for its moral framework, and I’m just decidedly not a utilitarian. I consider relationships, rights, and motives to matter when judging something.

    2. The whole “earn to give” thing is just a disastrous concept, most publicly in giving cover to things like FTX.

    3. It lacks any theory of power or overall social or economic change. Singer on this issue:

    • EthicalAI@beehaw.orgOPEnglish
      4·
      1 year ago

      I agree. I built my life around earn to give. It just leaves the giver morally empty and supporting a capitalist system, and the receiver dependent on charity. A hundred thousand people receiving malaria vaccines (or whatever) is immensely powerful, but they still live in a country that didn’t apparently want to give malaria vaccines to its citizens? What will happen to them now? It does nothing to solve the problem. And I can’t really know because I live across the world. Local action is the best way. Even if it’s not “cost effective” you can identify problems that affect real people right next door, and both of you will benefit from that, and make a friend.

    • beerd@beehaw.orgEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      I think utilitarianism is too diverse to just put EA in that box and therefore say its bad. I agree that it could be used as a cover, but for most people it just means finding the best way to help with their limited resources. I agree that it probably wont make systematic changes, but that requires a level of capital that is unavailable for the average person anyway, who can probably make a more significant change in this regard using their voice and vote, while directing their modest resources to where it can already make significant improvement.