• sznio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What beehaw did is very detrimental to the health of the fediverse, especially in the most crucial month.

    I don’t blame them though. They are running a really specific community with it’s own culture and it ended up getting disrupted and diluted by the influx of new users.

    In a month everything will calm down and I hope they refederate again.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I blame them for not trying anything else.

      This is like… Getting a flu and deciding to chop off their nose.

      • Sertou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        “We tried nothing, and we’re out of ideas.”

        Personally, I like Beehaw. They’ve got a good thing going, so I hope they get moderation squared away and re-federate. But they de-federated at a critical time, and I think they’ll do themselves more harm than they’ll do the fediverse.

        I suspect we’re going to see a lot of churn in the ‘verse in the coming days weeks and months. New instances will arise and disappear frequently. Eventually things will stabilize with most users on a few enduring servers, with new ones popping up less frequently than they do now.

        Beehaw may be an early casualty of the churn. If so, they’ll provide an object lesson in how not to manage such transitions.

      • Elle@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tbh they recognize that it’s a major response, but they genuinely can’t try much else given the tools at their disposal.

        Part of the fediverse is that each community operates according to their own rules, and while they can talk to other admins, they can’t force them into anything like reviewing registrations or the like.

        • eee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          they could have gotten more mods. That’s the temporary solution until better mod tools come along.

          • Elle@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s maybe true. I say maybe, only because for instance-wide moderation (as I think they’d like), I don’t know if Lemmy has a position between Admin & Mod with that kind of capability.

            For Beehaw, where they’re limiting community creation, I think they’re only able to do that by restricting it to the Admins, meaning adding more mods would also mean more admins in their case. If admin abilities in Lemmy are like in any other software I’m aware of, you wouldn’t really want to just dole that out to anyone, so I can see why it’s not so simple a matter for them with the kind of carefully moderated community their aiming for given the current tools.

            • eee@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              that’s true, but for a community as restricted as beehaw wehre users can’t create new communities, even if there’s no such position as “instance-wide mod”, the admins can just add more mods to each community.

              • Elle@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re right, I made myself wonder after writing that. Checked over there & found that they have done just that in some (maybe all?) of their communities.