• Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Perkins said he tried to shoot the gun out of Mungeam’s hand, a skill he said he learned in training. The Republic could not confirm if officers are trained to shoot items out of suspects’ hands.

    That… that’s not a thing… and I guess he just kept trying after he kept failing to shoot the gun out of his hand…

    What kind of “seen too many movies” bullshit is this.

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need to have body cams standardized across the board. We always assumed cops say the truth. Their testimony passes as truth in court. After finding out how much they lie, we need to hold them accountable.

    • doctorskull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      And harsh penalties (that are actually enforced) for officers turning them off or obstructing them in any way

      • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even better, an automatic presumptuon of guilt with weapon discharges and camera “malfunctions” with the onus on the officer to raise an affirmative defense successfully. Is it going to be burdensome for the police? Yes. But that’s the fucking point. Weapon discharges should be a true life or death last resort only

        • Cyborganism
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even the military require that soldiers request a go ahead when they need to fire their weapon. Cops should do the same at a minimum. Or face consequences.

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      we have HAD body cams, and they have NOT been held accountable. They make things WORSE because if they catch something on camera later they can use it against you even if it had nothing to do with what was being recorded at the time.

      • Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How can they use it against you if you had nothing to do with an incident???

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law”

          Is not “anything you say may or may not be used to help prove your innocence”

          they tell you flat out they’re out to get you even if they know they’re wrong

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even worse, the shooter wasn’t a “cop” he was a “Constable” and the distinction is important. A Constable isn’t allowed to carry a gun nor are they allowed to physically evict a tenant. They’re allowed to serve the paperwork, which he’d already done 4 days prior, and that’s it. That’s as far as their authority goes.

      This guy was genuinely out looking for a situation where he could shoot someone and after he shot Magnus he tried to do it AGAIN not a month later.

      https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix-breaking/2022/12/30/maricopa-county-constable-resigns-after-republic-investigation/69765623007/

      • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the US the only people more dangerous to be around than cops are the people that desperately wish they were cops.

        • atetulo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess you’re talking from experience and not just what the media reports on.

          I, personally, have had 0 bad experiences with law enforcement. Really puts things into perspective when I have my own experiences to contrast what I read online.

          • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I guess you’re talking from experience and not just what the media reports on.

            Sure.

            I, personally, have had 0 bad experiences with law enforcement.

            That’s good.

            Really puts things into perspective when I have my own experiences to contrast what I read online.

            LOL I’m sure the irony of this statement is completely lost on you.

            • motherr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s some Nancy Reagan level “I don’t care about an issue until it affects me personally” he’s got going on.

            • atetulo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              21
              ·
              1 year ago

              What are you talking about?

              Say something of substance, if you can.

              • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What are you talking about?

                Say something of substance, if you can.

                Oh I already did… But as I thought, the irony of your own point was completely lost on you. If you insist on having your hand held in an effort to get you to understand that the experiences of others are just as valid as your own, fine. But only one of us here is suggesting the other thinks the way they do because of “WhAt ThE mEdIa RePoRts On.” Got it? Good. We’re done here.