• jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    school pronoun policy

    Too long have the youth of this nation suffered in the anarchy that results from everyone being free to use whichever pronouns they feel are appropriate. it’s about time we came to our senses and started some serious regulation of this chaotic language. But all the talk seems to be about pronouns, and nobody is even considering the kind of strict regulations we need for the even more dangerous grammatical menace: Adverbs. People are going about using them freely, without concern for decency. It’s liberalism gone mad! Won’t someone stop to think carefully about the children?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh in that case then why is it not falling to what the experts say? Namely both Canadian and UN as well as specialist organizations on psychology all agree it’s a normal form of human expression.

      And even if it wasn’t. If parents were disproportionately likely to disown or abuse children upon learning they have an anxiety disorder then it’s reasonable to stop disclosure to parents against the child’s will as that disclosure would have potential harm.

        • jadero
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would guess that it was for the same reason that you “wasted” your excellent points regarding mental illness. To participate in the discussion, to raise issues that are perhaps not properly considered or analyzed, and to get the ideas out there for use by others. Isn’t that why we’re all here, to learn, teach, discuss, share?

            • jadero
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I would say that your comments were not wasted. Maybe I’m the only person who had never heard it framed as a battle over what can legitimately be called a mental illness, but at least one person has new insight into the issue.

              • MaxHardwood
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because describing it that way is a dog whistle. As another has pointed out, if it was really about mental illness why does an untrained/non-medical parent have any input on the policy?

                • jadero
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not everything is a dog whistle and not every policy input needs to be restricted to those with specific expertise. I have no mental health training, so I shouldn’t be making frontline decisions, but that doesn’t change the fact that I want appropriate expertise in place. If that is not policy input, what is it?

  • Paragone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All this screaming about “rights” of parents to obliterate-the-validity of children, and obliterate children’s-rights…

    LET THE CHILDREN VOTE/DECIDE THE ISSUE, NOT US “GROWN-UPS”.

    It is THEIR prison/containment, that THEIR lives are stuck in:

    THEY, ALONE, have moral-ground to be deciding their right to their gender-identity.

    THEY are valid, therefore their self-determination must have rights.

    Why can’t any of the ideology-worshippers stomach this fact??

    : \

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mean… Let actual experts decide (they also happen to align with what most children want, funny that).

      We don’t let children chose the curriculum for anything else, this subject shouldn’t be an exception. The problem is parents and politicians putting their nose in something they don’t understand.