• jadero
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would guess that it was for the same reason that you “wasted” your excellent points regarding mental illness. To participate in the discussion, to raise issues that are perhaps not properly considered or analyzed, and to get the ideas out there for use by others. Isn’t that why we’re all here, to learn, teach, discuss, share?

        • jadero
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would say that your comments were not wasted. Maybe I’m the only person who had never heard it framed as a battle over what can legitimately be called a mental illness, but at least one person has new insight into the issue.

          • MaxHardwood
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because describing it that way is a dog whistle. As another has pointed out, if it was really about mental illness why does an untrained/non-medical parent have any input on the policy?

            • jadero
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not everything is a dog whistle and not every policy input needs to be restricted to those with specific expertise. I have no mental health training, so I shouldn’t be making frontline decisions, but that doesn’t change the fact that I want appropriate expertise in place. If that is not policy input, what is it?