• BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Semantics, but if you really want to get into it, a lack of ability for things to be good or bad is still better than the existence and perpetuation of suffering.

    Also, responding to differing worldviews with “see a therapist” and comparing them to a villain is fucking disgusting

    • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      How could it be better? There’d be no one around to make that judgment call, so it’s a fundamentally illogical statement.

      And I calls em like I sees em Mr. Saturday Morning Cartoon Villain Apologist.

        • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Surely the core arguments that an anti-natalist might bring forward apply to any sentient beings, right? Like, a cat didn’t give prior consent to existing any more than a human did. Ergo, I do think it’s reasonable to point out that there would be no observer that could witness, much less enjoy any benefit from, the anti-natalist ideal world.