The deadly Hamas militant attack on Israel and the massive retaliation it provoked from Jerusalem have thrust President Joe Biden into a Middle East crisis that risks expanding into a broader conflict and has left him fending off criticism from GOP presidential rivals that his administration’s policies led to this moment.

The potential for prolonged and expanding violence could test Biden’s leadership on both the world stage and at home as he tries to navigate between demonstrating unflinching support for Israel and fostering a broader peace in the combustible Mideast, where sympathetic militants were quick to loudly praise the action by Hamas. Hundreds have been killed on both sides.

Lebanon’s Hezbollah group welcomed the attack as a response to “Israeli crimes.” The Iran-backed group, which holds similar goals as Hamas for the destruction of the Israeli state, fired rockets and shells on Sunday at three Israeli positions, drawing a response from Israel’s military with armed drones. A senior adviser to Iran’s supreme leader lauded the operation by Hamas, which said it was ready for a potentially long fight.

Several 2024 Republican presidential contenders immediately tried to pin a portion of the blame on Biden. They sought to tie his recent decision to release $6 billion in blocked Iranian funds in exchange for freeing five Americans who had been detained in Iran to Saturday’s complex attack by air, land and sea. The White House pushed back fiercely against the GOP criticism, noting that the money unfrozen last month in the prisoner swap has yet to be spent by Iran and can only be used for humanitarian needs.

    • howrar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You just rephrased the passage I quoted. How does using this money for humanitarian purposes prevent them from using other money for a different purpose?

      • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is to prevent them? Well, nothing since Trump tore up an international treaty with them. But, that is true of their complete economy. Barring an agreement, Iran can and probably will be a human rights violator and the US can only apply sanctions that they can.

        • howrar
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, so I don’t understand what you were trying to get at with your initial comment. Sounds like we’re in agreement here.

          • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Whatever rings your bell. Fact of the matter is that South Korea owed this money to Iran, and short of stealing it somehow there was no question they would get it. Now at least what it buys is controlled a bit.