• trailing9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Right, but you want children to learn that they stick to their duties. Not the best for the child but the best for society and if it is a good society, the best for the child.

    People are only trapped if they cannot change. What’s the bigger trap, that you have to find people who suit you or that you can find common ground with everybody?

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, kids should be taught that things aren’t set in stone

      We shouldn’t follow duties if they’re not working out for anybody. We shouldn’t keep doing things as we always have when that doesn’t work anymore, or one can go about it in a better way. One should embrace change, and not be scared of it.

      In addition, people can change for the worse (or reveal their true nature), and not want to get better. My parents aren’t good people, and I refuse to follow any “but it’s your duty and they are your parents!!” that society and others try to press onto me. And neither will I bother with following society’s standard for marriage and monogamy, and instead do what is best for me in my life.

      • trailing9@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree. I just think that marriage can also be an opportunity to change for the better, most of the times when both are ready for change.

        • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Marriage was for political means first and foremost. Then it was romanticized.

          If you need mariage for an opportunity to change for the better, then you shouldn’t be the person to get married in the first place.