• yeather
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because that’s not technically illegal until the gag order, which went into effect after the post was made.

        • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          He wasn’t threatening. He was insulting. The word “attack” is misleading in this context.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The threat wasn’t explicit, but it was certainly implicit. That’s why he posted her personal social media info. He is fully aware he has an army of followers that will take that and run with it. I don’t think that he should be able to get away with that so easily.

            • yeather
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which is why he now has a gag order. The act of posting someone’s ig isn’t illegal, but now it is with the gag order.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                If I had thousands of followers and I posted your social media info while insulting you, wouldn’t you consider that a threat? I don’t think a gag order, which was very narrow, is much of a punishment.

                • yeather
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Legally that is not a threat. Now it is a violation of the gag order, which is illegal. A lawyer could try and argue it is a threat, but that could take much longer, set precedent for future cases, and isn’t as guaranteed as a gag order.

          • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            He was also inciting his followers.

            Whether or not it rises to the level of “inciting imminent lawless action” is a different topic, but it’s not like he was merely insulting someone to their face - he was pointing tens of millions of his psycho followers at her.