I want to talk about this because of a conversation I had with a colleague on a lunch break a few days ago. I am a doctor, and I was talking to him about how angry I was (and still am) about the fact that the COVID vaccines, when they were first invented, were not made public, but instead were patented and sold. This basic fact made millions of people around the world suffer. I was rambling about how scientific information should always be free. How we should be able to use the internet as the greatest library our ancestors could have only dreamt of, instead of putting information behind paywalls. Even back in med school I was an avid user of sci-hub and I wasn’t ashamed of it one bit. I still use sci-hub to keep up with new researches so I can treat/inform my patients better. And I hate how some of my colleagues think that I am stealing others’ work.

Anyways, so I was rambling on and on. I sometimes do that. And my friend said something so strange and unrelated (in my eyes) to the conversation. He said “Look at you, defending open access to medical information for everyone, yet you only use Apple products.” I was like, “What? What do you mean?” He explained, “Man, all the things you use are made by Apple. Your laptop, tablet, phone, watch, earbuds or whatever, made by the company that is one of the main adversaries when it comes to right-to-repair and open source software.” So you need to see here, I’m not a tech guy. It’s just not my field. My job only requires me to read textbooks and keep up with new researches in my field, which any device can do. So I was like, “I… I don’t think I follow.” So he briefly explained what open-source software is, and how it’s related to my idea of free and open access to information for everyone, but this time it’s not in our field but programmers’. And when I almost reflexively said “Well we’re not programmers” he said “I mean, when it comes to software, it’s the programmers’ and developers’ thing. But free and open source is an idea. It applies to everything. And I think you’re supporting a company that opposes your views by buying their products.”

We didn’t have much time left so that was the end of that conversation. And I have been thinking about it since. When buying tech products I mainly care about if they are integrated with each other or not. Like if I turn on Do not Disturb on my watch, I want my phone, tablet and laptop to go quiet as well. Or I like being able to answer a phone call on my laptop. And I love the aesthetics of Apple products, at least more than what other companies have to offer.

Every evening since that conversation I’ve been looking up stuff related to open source software. Linux, distros, the philosophy behind it all, Linus Torvalds, Steve Wozniak, Arch, “read the wiki”, terminal, GUI, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA my brain is filled with so many things at this point that I don’t understand anything at all.

So, TLDR; I’d love to hear your opinions about Apple. Most people (myself included) buy Apple devices because of the ecosystem, the design, privacy (?), consistent updates (especially on mobile), or for you might say, a lack of knowledge in the field of tech. Do you support Apple or are you against them, or are you indifferent? Do you think people who are not in the tech field as well should look into and use open source software? Leave your thoughts below! ^^

  • metaltoilet@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guy was just converted into a FOSS nerd. Give it a few months and he’ll own a thinkpad with a custom i3 rice and be saying “I use arch btw”.

    Jokes aside, I think apple is a terrible company. Sure, their products are amazing but they’re grossly overpriced and not FOSS or compatible with anything else.

    The iphone 14 pro max costs $464 to make and retails for $2000. That’s not innovation, that’s grifting. Besides, the main difference between the Iphone 11 and 14 is the price (no, the camera is not that much better, i don’t care what you say).

    Apple also intentionally gatekeeps their products (Vender Lock-in) making the experience worse for everyone who doesn’t own Apple products. They could adopt the open standard that all other phones use for texting (MMS I think it’s called) but instead they use imessage to make your experience worse when texting people with Androids. This also makes it hard to switch to an Android even if it’s better. And don’t even get me started on the charger situation.

    Also, they use privacy as a branding statement but we have no way to verify that claim. They could be selling all our data and be well within their rights. If they were open source we would be able to verify that claim.

    I can’t really talk though because I own a (refurbished) Iphone. I do this because a) the messaging system and b) my whole family is in the apple ecosystem (with no way out) so I get benefits of our family plan like tons of storage.

    • DJDarren@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The iphone 14 pro max costs $464 to make and retails for $2000. That’s not innovation, that’s grifting.

      The material cost of a product is not the same as the cost of the product to the company. Granted, $2k is overpriced, but not by $1500.

    • El Duderino@partizle.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The iphone 14 pro max costs $464 to make and retails for $2000

      I think this in particular is a spurious claim to make. First of all, that was for a phone that retails for $1,099.

      Second, a bill of materials is not the cost of a device. There’s research and development, user testing, patents to license, logistics, and of course, software development, unless you think all of those things are done for free.

      Apple’s actual profit margin is ~25%.