• explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Please do, only a handful of wealthy people actually benefit from IP laws. The Americans defending it claim to be creative but are somehow unable to imagine anything better than intentional monopolies.

    “The most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.” — Steve Biko

    Sincerely,
    an American who makes IP for a living

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Roll back to 20 year copyright on media. Absolute bullshit for grandkids to be authorities on works created by people they didnt know and had no hand in creating.

    • obvs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      At this point, it’s been pretty well proven that the idea of intellectual property does a lot more harm just in general than any problem it supposedly solves.

      You want to end all of the monopolies? Take away the idea that ideas can be owned.

      And all of these companies that routinely buy off elections? They can’t compete with free.

      All of these medicines which cost ten million dollars per pill? People would LOVE to pay $5 per pill for them.

      The idea of intellectual property does NOT spur innovation. That claim is laughable. What it DOES spur is the creation of the least valuable workable solution, and then the smallest possible incremental improvement whenever the patent or copyright is about to run out. It literally PREVENTS useful technologies from coming to market, and prevents the poor(who would rush into many job markets if there weren’t literal IP restrictions on them) from working in many cases.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I do think that creators should get a chance with their creations, be it a character a technology or a drug. I just dont think Mickey Mouse should belong to someone now.

        • PheasantPlucker@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          47 minutes ago

          It’s ok for Mickey Mouse to belong to someone - as a trademark. But the old films should be out of copyright.

  • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 day ago

    Or simply repeal the DRM laws that are the basis of the most exploitative US businesses. As Cory Doctorow has pointed out earlier

  • StoneyPicton
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Years ago they gave Apple a patent for using your face to open your phone, neither of which are technologies with any link to Apple. That’s all you need to know.

  • TheObviousSolution@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    AI is ignoring so many IP laws while the US government continues to push and collude with its cartels, all the while making sure the technology bubble is all AI and is all US centered. The EU certainly needs to do something, but I imagine many in the EU don’t want to put their own IP at risk.

    • huppakee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      24 hours ago

      don’t want to put their own IP at risk.

      Understandably if you ask me. Instead of abolishing copyright laws we should just quiet quit on protecting US intellectual property and let everyone get away with infringing us copyright and give back the peoples access to to open seas 🏴‍☠️.

  • Bazell@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    You don’t need army and nukes to fuck up the USA. All you need is to hit its economy.

    • andallthat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      And then there’s Trump, who’s managing to use the US army to fuck up everyone’s economy, including their own. Talk about thinking ouside the box…

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    THIS was an appropriate time to be using falsifying-quotes:

    the “nuclear” option.

    Unfortunately, Netanyahu’s nearly-certainly weighing the actual nuclear option on Iran, then ALL Muslim-countries, the minute ANYone retaliates ( mass-shooting, nuclear style ).

    Which means that keeping things clear, differentiating between “nuclear” & nuclear, would be wise.

    _ /\ _

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    this does get me. What is the us leverage at this point? Why is any coutry going along at this point with our crazy ip laws?

  • gressen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    How about EU doesn’t attack anything but rather just repair a broken and outdated relationship?