• SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That could already happen with AI technology from months ago. This is not news.

    The targeted ads will be that if you follow specific broadcasts, you will get an higher chance to get an ad voiced by a person in that podcast. AI has little to do here, could have always been done.

    Unfortunately its use in the US politics its inevitable, with what I am understanding since i’ve started to follow it.

    • TheAgeOfSuperboredom
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The dangerous part is that it sounds like the ad is generated by Spotify.

      In the “tech already exists” scenario, an advertising firm will have to guess at the voice people want to hear and submit their own audio files to advertise.

      If this works the way it sounds, the ad firm sends in some text and Spotify generates a voice ad based on who you listen to. Less effort on the advertising firm and far more targeted.

      Both are bad. The second is worse!

      And frankly, it’s another reason not to support Spotify. You are supposed to be paying to listen to music, not support research into this bullshit advertising.

    • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a difference between being able to technically do this, and deploying it as a product with legal checks and scaled up infrastructure.

      Since the article was about generative voice models, I assumed the ad part was also about that, but you’re right it might just be using voice recognition.