If the polling is this wacky, why bother publishing it at all?

Over the weekend, ABC and the Washington Post published the results of a poll that made both operations look like its results were the product of a month-long exercise with a Magic 8-Ball. The way you know it was an embarrassment is the Post story about the poll began by telling us all we should probably ignore it completely.

The Post-ABC poll shows Biden trailing Trump by 10 percentage points at this early stage in the election cycle, although the sizable margin of Trump’s lead in this survey is significantly at odds with other public polls that show the general election contest a virtual dead heat. The difference between this poll and others, as well as the unusual makeup of Trump’s and Biden’s coalitions in this survey, suggest it is probably an outlier.

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t get complacent. That’s the most important takeaway. We need to not only beat Republicans, but to give them massive losses. We want them to lose by double digit margins so they realize fascism has no place in the US, and MAGA can ma-get the fuck out of here.

    I’m really curious to read more about the poll itself later, just with how unusual this is. What in the methodology screwed it up? Or do they just have an incredibly wide confidence interval?

    It’s also worth remembering I think, polling was very wrong in the midterms. They suggested at best that Republicans would win by a little bit, and at worst the “red tidal wave”. And we know now it was a trickle, that they can’t even claim as a total victory. Dems gained a Senate seat, and a lot of important state government positions in swing states.

    There’s a few causes for this mismatch I believe:

    • There’s a lot of shitty Republicans pollsters these days that provide a lot of low quality data.

    • Analysts overcorrected their models after 2020 and it undercounts Democrats.

    • The huge backlash for overturning Roe isn’t being captured in polls for some reason. Abortion continues to be a huge issue that’s benefitting Democrats. The economy and inflation were thought to be the largest drivers for the midterms, but if they were, people saw Democrats as the solution for that.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We want them to lose by double digit margins so they realize fascism has no place in the US, and MAGA can ma-get the fuck out of here.

      These fascists aren’t going to suddenly become sane democratic loving colleagues if MAGA falls out of fashion. Even if they put their masks back on, they’re still going to be fascists.

      The republican party needs to die. Scorched earth, razed to the ground. Democrats need a super majority, and then subsequently split into 2 or more parties to become the new 2 party system, or preferably ranked choice and have to work as a coalition.

      Edit - and there needs to be a public education attempt at making the cultists masses understand the dangers of fascism, and that it’s wrong. We currently have a culture war trying to rebrand the civil war and nazism as misunderstood. The parallels on nazi Germany are not hyperbole. We need public accountability and public education to aggressive stave this off before its too late.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I completely agree with everything you’ve said. My view is that if the Republicans lose big, they’ll abandon the fascist wing and see it as a liability to winning elections. If they get absolutely crushed, their turn towards fascism and Trump becomes completely repudiated, and they’re going to try and distance themselves from it. These dregs will always exist, we just need to teach conservatives what happens when you ally with them – you lose, big time.

        I think the party would be likely to fragment on a loss. You’ll have the fascist freedom caucus on one end, and the more moderate Republicans on the other. Neither however will be large enough to win elections, especially as they’ll compete for the same voters. My prediction is the Republicans die in all but name, and those closer to the middle join Democrats.

    • CileTheSane
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a few causes for this mismatch I believe:

      Also keep in mind the sampling bias of only including people willing to take part in polls.

      Unknown number? Stranger knocking at my door? I’m not answering.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah this is the Achilles heel of polling. You need a sample as close to random as possible, but that’s hard if 75% of those people don’t respond.

    • jocanib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t get complacent.

      This was a good start. But then you finished by giving loads of reasons to remain complacent.

      Polticial polls have to adjust for turnout and that is extremely difficult to get right. But it is a nailed on guarantee that Trump fans will turn out. Dems should be worried that the polls (in general, not just this one) are very close. Biden’s presidency has been somewhat better than expected from a progressive perspective but is still too beholden to the kind of Dem that lost it in 2016 by appealing solely to rich people instead of the tens of millions of voters with no one to vote for. They will struggle to enthuse the people they need to enthuse and that is showing up in the polls.

      Don’t get complacent. Don’t push narratives that encourage complacency.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The second part of my comment is more of an academic exercise in trying to determine why the polls might be off. I’m curious as to what’s throwing them off.

        That’s why I opened by saying we shouldn’t get complacent. It’s worthwhile to figure out why this isn’t going right, but irrespective of the answer, we can’t let our guard down.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because young people aren’t fucking idiots?

        They know Biden tried to have more forgiven and deferred, but the supreme court stopped him. The same supreme court which overturned roe. Abortion in itself is enough really.

        Oh, and young people fucking loathe Republicans, so there’s that too!

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I suggest you do a considerable bit of research. There is no big national election this year. And the legislation which mandated the restart date chose the exact same restart date that the department of education had already set. There was absolutely no change there.

            The Supreme Court wasn’t about a law, but an action that Biden tried to take, and the Court said he couldn’t do (which legally really makes no sense if you read the relevant constitutional passages).

      • CileTheSane
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Didn’t they stop payments on student loans and try to forgive them completely?