Maxwell appeared virtually for a closed-door deposition from the Texas prison where she is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking.

Republican House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer said that “as expected”, Maxwell pleaded the Fifth Amendment, invoking her right to remain silent.

“This is obviously very disappointing,” he said. “We had many questions to ask about the crimes she and Epstein committed, as well as questions about potential co-conspirators.”

  • mysticpickle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    22 days ago

    As per the terms of her agreement with Trump to continue her cushy stay at Club Fed 🙄

  • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    22 days ago

    So then did they submit the evidence they already had in the form of questions? For example, “we have this documented evidence here, which shows XYZ, do you wish to make comment on this matter?” “I plead the 5th.”, GM. And keep doing that hour after hour till all of the evidence has been read into the record. Oh, right, and also make sure that this happened in public. Oh, what’s that? This was a closed door session? Well there’s your problem. We’re trying to exhibit transparency, aren’t we? Power cycle the system, and when it reboots, try again with an OPEN DOOR SESSION so that your bosses, the United States Citizens can know exactly what is going on. Try that and see how it works.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      The intent of the fifth amendment is that one cannot be punished for failing to testify if the testimony is self-incriminating.

      As much as Maxwell is a reprehensible human being, the law exists for good reasons.

      ETA: using the fifth amendment as a bargaining chip (as in “if Trump grants clemency, I’ll talk) is an inevitable outcome, but also entirely dirtbag manoeuvre.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        In criminal trials, not civil. You technically do not even have a fifth amendment right in civil trials.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            Yes. It just didn’t work the same. Statements you refuse to answer can be seen in the light least favorable to your position whereas in criminal cases you can’t make any determination or assumption about answers that people refuse to answer.

    • ryper
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      22 days ago

      Trump got her moved to minimum-security, so they could certainly move her back to a more jail-y jail.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Trump is running the show. DOJ has his arm up their ass. He can keep her in the cushy prison where she gets whatever she wants or put her in federal prison and have her killed just like her homie.

          • Billegh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Right. The only people who could do anything to her won’t because the cheeto in charge won’t let them. All congress can do is be angry about it.