An investigation by Wired reveals the grisly complications of Neuralink brain implants in monkeys, including brain swelling and paralysis.

  • squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s testing it on paralyzed people, so they’re probably depressed and desperate. It’s kind of like he’s trying to help, but it could be seen as sleazy because he knows these people will try anything to fix their situation.

    • DeveloperKai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “He’s testing it on paralyzed people”

      He’s exploiting paralyzed people under the guise of trying to help them.

        • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean, at some point a treatment for the disabled has to be tested on the disabled.

          There’s a lot wrong with Musk, but testing a medical device on the target patients is hardly unethical.

          • keefshape
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is at the current stage. That is the point.

          • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            When some stupid high percentage of animal test subjects die from the test, you would think they’d work on the product more before moving forward. Instead they’re like “welp caused paralysis and death in the majority of our animal test patients, this is totally ready for human tests!”

            • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not saying their methods aren’t flawed, just that testing a medical device on the targeted users is not at all unethical and is a requirement for approval.

    • Clevermistakes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So to phrase this appropriately: you could say the apartheid blood emerald trust fund baby is experimenting with dangerous technology on disabled people because he views them as less than human. I don’t think it can be viewed any other way than sleazy. Besides it’s not like people with disabilities are so desperate they don’t care about their quality of life.