I’ve generally been against giving AI works copyright, but this article presented what I felt were compelling arguments for why I might be wrong. What do you think?

  • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, the arguments presented in the article are not compelling.

    A bit like how Euthanasia is foundationaly fine but it’s allowance under capitalism leads to the poor being pressured to die, while capitalism oppresses us fucking over A.I. art’s ability to be copyrighted is good.

    If it were allowed to be copyrit corporations would fuck over creatives more than they currently do and use it to union bust.
    Of course in a post-capitalist world copyright won’t matter.

    Therefore this shit should never get copyright protection.