• Amilo159@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not about that, at all. It’s Facebook actively removing shared events and posts within a community, because Indian gov asked them to.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        So, fb is an unreliable place to post information you want others to see?

        Sounds like what I was talking about.

        If they are willing to remove this at the behest of a foreign nation, I do not trust them to be a disseminator of any news or information,

  • Grimpen
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    Meanwhile I’ve seen this story all over Canadian Mastodon and Lemmy. I guess Meta just has to do business in India.

  • grteOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ban Facebook from Canada entirely, I say.

    • Swim
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      how about we just use it for its intended use and not expect to rely on it for key information???

      • keefshape
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Because there were and are few better more accessible news aggregation options. (Edit- for the general less technically minded folks).

        Here we are on the fediverse trying to change that. Make sure you preach outside of the echo chamber.

      • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s intended use it to gather information on you and sell it to people who sell you things you don’t need.

        • Swim
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          that doesnt sound like a reliable news source…

  • Yezzey
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I tried to post several links to news on this topic to Facebook just now. Would not let me. Now all posts except ads are blank now. I guess that’s my “punishment”. Fuck you Facebook!

    • Steeve
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • Yezzey
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I tried posting a link from NPR also

      • festus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        FYI for Facebook to be exempt from C-18 they had to ban all news and not just Canadian news.

  • Steeve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • grteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Really? Data harvesting company Meta didn’t know which country these posts originated from, on their own site? I have my doubts, to say the least.

      • Oldmandan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I mean, Meta being incompetent doesn’t exactly surprise me, but it’s not exactly a good look either way. (Since when does Meta do authoritarian governments’ censorship for them? Nations can make takedown requests on their citizens posting news they don’t like? On one hand, of course. Like a billion people live in India, Facebook will do whatever it can to keep that business. As much as alreadyI dislike Facebook, the idea had never crossed my mind before.)

        • LostWon
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Didn’t Facebook (among others) recently provide profile data on women who were being investigated under suspicion of having had abortions in the US? To them, it’s about whatever they can do to make the most money possible, and India is a major population centre.

            • LostWon
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              My point was about them operating in countries under whatever rules apply in those countries. Put another way, Meta (like most corporations) will routinely follow authoritarian laws in any large market (such as those of the US and India) where they can stand to make a lot of money (from selling advertising). Generally if they don’t, it will be either directly or indirectly profit-related.

        • Steeve
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • Oldmandan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            I get that intellectually, it’s just something that didn’t really click, before. If a corporation is subject to the laws of all countries it operates within, (even when those laws contradict) are they really subject to any laws? Only applying law based on user origin does sidestep that for the most part (even though virtual ‘spaces’ like Facebook and other social media do make that kind of weird), but mixups like this make that tension more obvious.

            • LostWon
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              They’re not subject to all of the laws at the same time. They’re subject to the laws that apply to each user’s country in that user’s case. If user A engages in an interaction with user B that is illegal for both parties in user B’s country but legal in user A’s country, only user B could be affected, assuming the interaction gets noticed. It’s similar to how if you shop on an online store like Amazon or Etsy, they have to charge your local taxes and not the seller’s taxes.

      • keefshape
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Do you really want Frontline facebook moderation staff (or many levels between) having the ability to run the kinds of queries required to validate country of origin or other privacy-invading points of validations required?

        I don’t.

        And it takes time for those kinds of queries to reach the (very busy) desks of the purposefully constrained few, who can.

        • grteOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Assuming that this is all a decision that came from front line moderation, which I don’t accept but we’ll do so for the sake of this argument, yes, I think moderation staff should probably know whether a given post is actually subject to Indian law before removing it on those grounds.

      • Steeve
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • grteOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          You should probably imagine differently, then. You seem to be bad at reading people.

    • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I guess he was a strong proponent of a Sikh free state, which Modi sees as a direct threat to his free and prosperous India (I believe he’s Hindu). So they labelled him a terrorist and had him shot outside a Sikh temple in BC…