Police investigation remains open. The photo of one of the minors included a fly; that is the logo of Clothoff, the application that is presumably being used to create the images, which promotes its services with the slogan: “Undress anybody with our free service!”

  • JoBo@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Indeed, once the AI gets good enough, the value of pictures and videos will plummet to zero.

    This just isn’t true. They will still be used to sexualise people, mostly girls and women, against their consent. It’s no different from AI-generated child pornography. It does harm even if no ‘real’ people appear in the images.

    Fucking horrible world we’re forced to live in. Where’s the fucking exit?

    • GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is different than AI-generated CSAM because real people are actually being harmed by these deepfake images.

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I was replying to someone who was claiming they aren’t harmful as long as everyone knows they’re fake. Maybe nitpick them, not me?

        Reak kids are harmed by AI CSAM normalising a problem they should be seeking help for, not getting off on.

        • ToyDorkB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • JoBo@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not getting beyond your first sentence here. I am not interested in what fucked up laws have been passed. Nor in engaging with someone who wants to argue that any form of child porn is somehow OK.

          • JoBo@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No I didn’t. Go nitpick someone else.

            Or better still, explain why you think AI-generated CSAM isn’t harmful. FFS

            • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Let’s be real here:

              Sure, it’s not illegal. But if I find “those kinds” of AI-generated images on someone’s phone or computer, the fact that it’s AI-generated will not improve my view of that person in any possible way.

              Even if it’s technically “legal”.

              They tellin’ on themselves.

          • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            People who consume any kind of cp are dangerous and encouraging thar behavior is just as criminal. I’m glad that shit is illegal in most civilized countries.

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How is this place infested with so many fucking nonces?

        I made no claims about “more harm” so what imaginary claim are you referring to in your attempt to justify CSAM?