• schmorp@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You cloud your mind with so many words, and most of them would be perfectly fitting for an EV advertising campaign.

    Developing ways of storing renewable energy? I’m all for it. But EVs are not equal to renewable energy, and renewable energy is in many cases not as clean as it is claimed to be.

    Digging lithium out of the earth (no, lithium is not recyclable so far, after a number of loading cycles the battery is trashed. For example look at this article). Less than 1% of Lithium recycled as of 2021??? And you call that renewable? Lithium is a hype that currently makes shady mining companies very rich, it is NOT eco - please invest in other developments. Private vehicles need to make space for public transport, I’m just as pissed about electric fucking eco SUVs as I am about other cars because it’s a stupid way for a society to solve transport. And this article of the so called MIT Climate Portal keeps peddling the private vehicle as the norm and future when we most urgently need less vehicles on the road.

    There is not much left other than profit driven motives in late stage capitalism. Bless your tiny heart if you still believe in any altruistic motive of the car/EV industry.

    • set_secret@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      now whilst this feels like playing chess with a pigeon at this point, let us address the nihilism and scientific misunderstandings presented here…

      Ah, the classic tactic of dismissing an argument as mere advertising fluff. But let’s not allow such distractions to cloud the facts.

      Conflating EVs with renewable energy is a straw man argument. No one claims they are the same, but EVs charged by renewable energy sources significantly reduce emissions compared to gas vehicles. That’s a fact, not a marketing ploy.

      Now, let’s tackle the lithium recycling misconception. Contrary to the claim, lithium-ion batteries can indeed be recycled. While the recycling rate is currently low, it is improving, driven by regulations, consumer awareness, and economic factors. Lithium recovery rates may be lower than other materials, but new processes aim to improve this. Dismissing lithium recycling as nonexistent is simply incorrect.

      As for the critique of renewable energy, no one claims it’s perfect. But it is far cleaner than fossil fuels, and its flaws should not be used as an excuse to halt progress. The push for EVs and renewable energy is not a mere capitalist ploy; it’s a necessary step towards a more sustainable future.

      Regarding private vehicles, I wholeheartedly agree that public transportation should be prioritized. However, this does not negate the need for cleaner personal transportation options. EVs can coexist with improved public transit systems, and both are essential for reducing emissions.

      Lastly, the cynicism about profit-driven motives is understandable, but it’s not the whole story. Government regulations, consumer demand, and genuine concern for the environment also drive the transition to EVs. To dismiss all motives as purely capitalist is to ignore the complexity of the issue.

      Let us not be blinded by nihilism or scientific misunderstandings. The transition to EVs and renewable energy is not without challenges, but it is a crucial step towards a more sustainable future. Let us hold companies and regulators accountable, push for better recycling and public transit, and continue to innovate for a cleaner world.

      bless your tiny brain for reading this and at least trying to comprehend.