The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fair enough. It’s not theft, it’s something else.

    But that’s just semantics, though.

    The point is that his voice is being used without his permission, and that companies, profiteering people, and scammers will do so using his voice and the voices others. He likely wants some kind of law against this kind of stuff.

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s emotionally charging to hear your own voice saying things you did not. Dismissing a victim describing what happened because they’re emotional about how they were wronged doesn’t make sense to me.

    • Hubi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      57
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is this different from a human doing an impersonation?

        • cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This, and it’s not a human. All these analogies trying to liken a learning algorithm to a learning human are not correct. An LLM is not a human.

          • idiomaddict@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes, but if “things” is replaced by scamming artists, that’s a shitty society

            • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Artists aren’t being scammed. They’re being replaced by automated systems. It’s the same thing that happened to weavers and glassblowers. The issue isn’t that their job is being automated. It’s that people replaced by automation aren’t compensated. Blame the game, not the players.

                • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  In this specific case, it’s more like a bunch of glassblowers were being paid to make designs on behalf of a company. Then they went on strike, and the company decided it would be cheaper to replicate their designs with an automated system than to meet the workers’ demands.

                  • idiomaddict@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The strike came after the jobs began to be replaced. They can currently mimic a few glass blown designs, and the strike is aimed at making sure that glass blowers don’t give more ammo to the animators.

          • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t think it’s a particularly odious mental challenge to understand that we’re not upset about the general concept of doing things at scale, and that it depends on what the thing in question is.

            For instance, you’d probably not be terribly upset about me randomly approaching you on the street once - mildly annoyed at most. You’d probably be much more upset if I followed you around 24/7 every time you entered a public space and kept badgering you.

      • Laticauda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know what the difference is, trying to act otherwise is just being obtuse.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There was a difference between complete duplication and impersonation for the purposes of satire.