• Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 year ago

      So does Walmart.

      Minimum wage should pay enough to live a minimum life. It doesn’t. Not even close

      • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Walmart is especially egregious because the SNAP benefits that subsidize their employees’ wages are often being used at Walmart. After all, if you need groceries why not pick them up at the store you work at after your shift?

        So not only do they not pay their workers enough by letting taxpayers subsidize wages, some of that taxpayer subsidy goes right into their pockets.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, I just realized what needs to be done. You know how many states come after the families of people who died on Medicaid to get the money back, seizing inheritance and assets? How about instead of that, they start charging businesses for employees being on government assistance? Just straight fine them for every employee who has to be on food stamps, cash assistance, or Medicaid. Idk, 10k/employee/year sounds about right. Then paying them all +9k/year becomes the cheaper option.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sort of funny that a food company doesn’t pay you enough to buy food so tells you to buy food stamps…

    • elouboub@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is basically a subsidy for McDonalds. If the only way a company can be rich is by subsidies, maybe it shouldn’t exist in the “free market”.