According to ancient Judaic texts, democratic will is not superior to correctness.

Amen, I say to you how many if you shall bind on the Earth, shall be bound in Heaven; and how many if you shall loose on the Earth, shall be loosed in Heaven.

https://biblehub.com/text/matthew/18-18.htm

Again, Amen I say to you that if two might agree of you on the Earth about any matter, that if they shall ask, it will become for them from the Father of Me Who is in Heaven.

https://biblehub.com/text/matthew/18-19.htm

Where for are two or three gather unto the My Name there am I in midst of them.

https://biblehub.com/text/matthew/18-20.htm

This statement is neither that YHWH/Jesus is somehow more present to gathered people, or is less present to a single individual.

This expression is in direct opposition to the superiority of minyans (most generally minimums of either 7 or 10 adult males in agreement), and the authority of “Rabbinic” law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minyan

Minyans had been required by Rabbinic (Pharisaic) law to perform priestly blessings according to interpretations of

Leviticus 22:32  And I shall be sanctified in the midst of the children of Israel

and

Numbers 16:21  Separate yourselves from the midst of the congregation.

Within this context, YHWH/Jesus is speaking directly to “The” - and not “some” - disciples.  By this, it may be inferred that His audience is the close inner social circle including some of the 12 apostles, and/or other close associates.  To these intimate companions He is conferring confidence in their judgement of His will - especially when agreeing amongst themselves - and assurance of special consideration due to their exceptional experience of Him.

By this means of accordant accession, many of the inaccuracies of Herod, Saul, Constantine, and others may be excluded from consideration.

SHABBAT SHALOM!