• littletoolshed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe Rivian should have a chat with some of the other car manufacturers to find out why so many of them also felt the same way at one time, and now are all almost totally on board with both Android Auto and Apple CarPlay.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Curious that the same is not true with CarPlay Ultra. Most brands rejected it outright.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Echoing his previous comments on the matter, Scaringe said Rivian is focused on offering a “seamless digital experience,” where customers do not need to switch between its own software and CarPlay.

    “Going without” apparently is seamless.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      The old suction cup phone charger is seamless indeed. Just stick it on the screen.

      Why the ceo of a struggling startup wants to die on this hill is baffling. I understand it from GM’s MBA idiots.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m not a fan (no pun) of touchscreen HVAC either, but if the choice is an otherwise substantially worse vehicle to the criteria that matters to me, I’ll bear with the touchscreen controls. Doing otherwise would be cutting off your nose to spite your face, no?

            • corsicanguppy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Physical controls while driving is just much safer.

              If your criteria is to be less safe, let me know which sidewalks you’ll be near so I can avoid them.

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Physical controls while driving is just much safer.

                I agree, but that fractional safety isn’t the only factor in deciding what car to buy, or at least it shouldn’t be.

                If your criteria is to be less safe, let me know which sidewalks you’ll be near so I can avoid them.

                Oh sweet summer child! You think that HVAC control distraction are even a rounding error of risk from distracted drivers behind the wheel? It is rare that I ever drive during the day I don’t see someone actively holding their phone in their hand to visually use it, and its not a quick glance, but miles of watching their phone of who-knows-what.

                If you’re primarily worried about drivers of cars with touch screen HVAC controls instead of distracted phone drivers, you’re not doing a great job of personal risk assessment.

            • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              It is more complicated than touch screen hvac = no buy. Temp controls need to be tactile, but the direction of the air doesn’t matter so much, if the car manages that properly. I have had one car which was adequately designed such that I almost never adjusted the temperature setting. Most cars I do need to adjust on a fairly regular basis. I’m referring exclusively to a system that tries to hold a temperature, not the old school sliders.

              I absolutely need defrost controls to be tactile (and heated seats, probably). There’s too many cars that do have that available (alongside windshield wipers and signal lights, hello Tesla) that I don’t need to compromise on essential controls.

              So rivian is off the list - if they made a vehicle I wanted in the first place, I might be disappointed!

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                So rivian is off the list - if they made a vehicle I wanted in the first place, I might be disappointed!

                So you’re posting in a Rivian community to…tell people you never liked the vehicles and would never consider owning one in the first place? Congrats?

  • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Guess I’m in the minority that finds Carplay really aggravating. Can’t pinch-zoom the map (at least on my vehicle), and my music player is functionally useless while the car is moving because Apple disallowed scrolling. Not that the car manufacturer offerings are much better…

  • supernight52@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Who cares? This is the epitome of “First-world problems.” Rivian is still the superior EV, imo, and this is a weird thing to get hung-up on- no matter which side of the argument you fall on.