We’ve noted a few times how the political push to ban TikTok is a dumb performance largely designed to distract people from our failure to pass even a basic internet privacy law or regulate data brokers. We’ve also noted how college bans of TikTok are a dumb extension of that dumb performance, and don’t accomplish anything of meaningful significance.

When the college bans first emerged we noted they’d be trivial to bypass, given the bans only apply to the actual college network. They obviously don’t apply to personal student use over cellular networks. And, not surprisingly, students are finding it extremely easy to bypass the bans, either by simply turning off Wi-Fi when they want to access the social network, or using a VPN:

“The student body, quietly, in unison, added Wi-Fi toggling to their daily routine. “Everyone was so nonchalant about it,” Pablo says. “They really just did not care.”

“There wasn’t a whole lot of pushback, aside from a lot of grumbling and groans,” says Ana Renfroe, a sophomore at Texas A&M. Some of her professors are still showing TikToks in class. They’ll just ask students to download the videos at home she explains, or will upload them to another platform like Instagram Reels.”

The folks who spent several years hyperventilating about how TikTok was some unique threat to the public (on an internet where countless international companies, ISPs, app makers, and data brokers over-collect and fail to secure consumer data) are, of course, nowhere to be found.

  • SharpieThunderflare
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    But now the college’s IT/security team doesn’t have to deal with that particular piece of spyware on their network, which is a step in the right direction.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is like putting a bandaid on a hatchet wound. We need actual data ownership laws in this country.

    • geosoco@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This doesn’t stop that at all. It just wouldn’t be able to send it to TikTok’s servers while connected to the network, but that doesn’t necessarily stop it from collecting shit.

      Besides, if they wanted to ‘spy’ on universities, the ones that banned it almost certainly weren’t the targets, and there’s more effective ways to get important data like having stuff on people’s laptops.

      • BenderOver@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It DOES stop that on a college network level. Maybe not per the individual… but that’s not the point anyway. The college/university doesn’t care that their students use the app. It cares that you are using it on their servers/devices because they view it as a vulnerability to their network.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They can literally just approach any US based social media and pay to access their data.

        If there is a threat it is Tiktok dumbing down people who use it. The amount of misinformation is staggering not to mention getting it users addicted to quick meaningless videos.

        I cringe everytime I see Tiktok or Youtube shorts. It is like they are designed for goldfish brains to watch with no long-term memory or critical thinking whatsoever.

    • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except it doesn’t? Any of the things TikTok would do it can still do when it reconnects to another Wifi network, or the cellular service, location tracking, etc. It’s not like TikTok is a worm that stays on a network – it records data more than uploads it.

  • BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Im pretty sure the point was to never ban it outright, it was to remove tiktok from the managed networks, which it has done extremely well.

    • geosoco@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think the IT teams were ever brought into that discussion, nor was security genuinely a concern. I think this was purely performance art.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is genuine security concerns, notably from most major cybersecurity experts. It was an overreaction, but it definitely was founded in reality.

            • geosoco@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Neither of those are about network security, but are about the ability to collect data on individuals or to influence campaigns.

              THe bans on university networks do not stop any of that, as this article points out.

              Additionally, the app can still collect data on the university networks. It just has to wait to send it until they connect to a different network (eg. cellular)

              If this was such a security concern, top-tier universities would be blocking it. Not 3rd and 4th tier universities with nothing to steal. If the Chinese government wanted data from a US university, they’d send someone over as a student to join the research labs it cared about.

              Additionally, from the same article you linked about why your response and the bans themselves don’t make sense:

              TikTok is hardly the only company swallowing a lot of data on Americans, from car makers to smart doorbell firms. Consumers’ credit card purchases, contact lists and recent GPS locations are hawked by hundreds, if not thousands, of companies in the so-called data broker industry, Germain noted.

              “If the Chinese government wanted it, they could just go out and buy it because it’s for sale,” he said. “…I think people, when they’re worried about TikTok doing something, they should ask themselves whether they should be worried about American companies doing the same thing.”

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They will become stupid by tirelessly watching stupid people doing stupid things on TikTok/YouTube.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        While that is true, it is also important to recognize that there is a ton of good informational content on YouTube. It’s a haven for engineers of all types, from rocketry, to electrical, to public works, and many many more.

  • Plopp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    TikToks and Reels in class? At the university? Jfc am I glad I already graduated.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Uhh, were those bans ever about students using it? Pretty sure it was about staff using it on university computers…

  • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey, remember when College and University were for adults? What’s next, permission slips for field trips? I’d feel so fucking insulted if the administration of the school I had gone to had decided they knew what was best for me to view online.

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re not banning it from your devices, they’re just banning it from their managed networks, just like a lot block porn and other “undesirable” content

      • Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        When i was in school in the 2000s file sharing basically crippled the campus network until it was banned. A few bad actors were hoarding all the bandwidth and storing copyright violation stuff on school servers.

      • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still, it’s unnecessary and controlling. Is there a context where the use of the network for undesirable, but not illegal, activity that wouldn’t get you into trouble anyways? Its really not the institutions business what people do in their dorms or on campus faculty housing that doesn’t impact other people or endanger the network/school.