• AndrasKrigare@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely makes sense for most planets to be rather barren.

    This idea is something I’ve heard a lot about Starfield and is why I don’t think I’ll pick it up, at least until a big sale. To me, it seems like they made a fair number of design decisions around what “makes sense” rather than what’s fun.

      • Pseu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        A place can have a barren atmosphere and aesthtic while also having content to find, even if that content is more sparse or minimal, suited to that lonely environment

        That’s exactly what they’ve done.

        A “barren” planet still has stuff. In the 5 minutes or so that I did random exploration I found a colonist hut that was razed by pirates with a hidden chest with like 3k credits, and a random vendor who was going a little nuts for being alone so long. Nothing incredible, but enough to make the place not feel dead on a random frozen moon.

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      When it comes to the barren planets, it just adds a bit of immersion IMO. Nobody is forcing you to visit those rocks, and you probably won’t ever land on most of them, but it’s cool that you can. So to me, it’s not something that has a negative effect on my enjoyment of the game.

      Makes sense to wait for a sale though. Mods and updates will no doubt vastly improve the game. Personally, I just play it on gamepass.

      • CMLVI@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m the same way. Even just going from the “lore” most planets aren’t going to have colorful interesting cities in it with unique locations and things to do. A lot of the rocks are going to be desolate with nothing on it, because they should be. When you find something of interest in the desolate void of space, it’s gonna be interesting. Every planet having the same formulaic procedurally shaped bar, merchant, and a fetch quest would have people foaming at the mouth about how Bethesda replaced their specific crafted environments with shitty generated ones with no soul.

      • saigot
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t played it yet (A second play through of BG3 sounds more appealing right now), but in general for an singleplayer RPG I would prefer a small full setting to an empty large one. If the environment has almost nothing of interest in it, then I’m going to just be glued to the objective marker, which while not a deal breaker, definitely hurts the experience. In a more curated environment I would ignore the objective marker and go off in a random direction. This means my experience is more unique and gives a proper sense of exploration which can make the game feel bigger even though it is technically smaller.

    • Erk@cdda.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t shape any of your decision to playor not play on this particular detail. It really has little to no impact on the game whatsoever. There are a lot of really interesting worlds to explore, it’s really not worth the amount of discussion lately.

      Not saying this means “this is the game for you”. Just that this one facet shouldn’t enter into your assessment at all, in my opinion.